{"id":26,"date":"2008-04-03T12:17:32","date_gmt":"2008-04-03T12:17:32","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2016-08-04T19:53:00","modified_gmt":"2016-08-05T00:53:00","slug":"journal-sentinel-value-in-region-rise-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/journal-sentinel-value-in-region-rise-6\/","title":{"rendered":"Journal Sentinel &#8211; Value in Region rise 6%"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Area growth &#8216;healthy&#8217; amid national issues<br \/>\nBy RICK ROMELL<br \/>\nrromell@journalsentinel.com<br \/>\nPosted: March 27, 2008<\/p>\n<p>The growth in property values in southeastern Wisconsin slowed last year but increased by a &#8220;still healthy&#8221; 6%, the Public Policy Forum said in newly released research.<br \/>\nWalworth and Kenosha counties, probably benefiting from their proximity to Chicago and northern Illinois, led the way. But the region as a whole held up well amid the problems that have beset real estate nationally, forum President Rob Henken said.  <\/p>\n<p>Southeastern Wisconsin&#8217;s property value growth fell off the 10.7% pace of 2005-&#8217;06, but other parts of the country have seen values decline, Henken said. &#8220;It certainly looks to be very good news &#8230;.that that has not  happened here as of the 2007 data, and having a 6% growth rate in the region is not anything to feel bad about,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Even these numbers may be higher than some had  expected.&#8221;Walworth County&#8217;s total value rose 10.5% last year. The county has gained 121.4% in value over the past decade.Kenosha County posted the next highest increase, 7.2%.<\/p>\n<p>Increases in the rest of the region were: Ozaukee County, 6.6%; Washington County, 5.7%; Racine County, 5.6%;Milwaukee County, 5.5%; and Waukesha County, 5.1%. Henken called the greater growth of the Illinois border counties &#8220;a valuable piece of information for policy-makers.&#8221; &#8220;It again points to the benefits of public policies, which are going to take advantage of our proximity to northern Illinois,&#8221; he said.   <\/p>\n<p>Property values for the state as a whole rose 6.2%. The report also shows the range in the value of property per person in the region&#8217;s communities.<br \/>\nwww.jsonline.com | Return to regular view<br \/>\nOriginal Story URL:<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.jsonline.com\/story\/index.aspx?id=732999<br \/>\nChenequa, in Waukesha County, is easily the wealthiest by this measure, with $971,508 in property value per resident.<\/p>\n<p>The lowest ranking community is Whitewater, in Walworth County, with $49,079 in property value per resident.<br \/>\nMilwaukee ranks fourth to last, at $53,995.<br \/>\nThe Public Policy Forum based its analysis on the equalized property values across the state determined by the state<br \/>\nDepartment of Revenue as of August.<br \/>\nBuy<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Area growth &#8216;healthy&#8217; amid national issues By RICK ROMELL rromell@journalsentinel.com Posted: March 27, 2008 The growth in property values in southeastern Wisconsin slowed last year but increased by a &#8220;still healthy&#8221; 6%, the Public Policy Forum said in newly released research. Walworth and Kenosha counties, probably benefiting from their proximity to Chicago and northern Illinois, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-26","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-lake-geneva-real-estate","7":"entry"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":583,"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26\/revisions\/583"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/margaretcanfield.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}